Tortorously Long
Sep. 17th, 2004 09:06 amI'm in a boring meeting in Charlotte; flying home later this afternoon. Thank goodness the conference room table has an ethernet jack.
A friend online just sent me an instant message that included my new phavorite phrase, "torturously long blow job". I snickered a bit loud, so I'll probably have to shut the laptop and actually participate in the meeting. Harumph.
On a different topic, Firefox is a *really* great new browser.

So far, I like it a whole lot -- even more than Safari on OSX. Snappy, snazzy, safe!
A friend online just sent me an instant message that included my new phavorite phrase, "torturously long blow job". I snickered a bit loud, so I'll probably have to shut the laptop and actually participate in the meeting. Harumph.
On a different topic, Firefox is a *really* great new browser.

So far, I like it a whole lot -- even more than Safari on OSX. Snappy, snazzy, safe!
JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 09:16 am (UTC)I've heard from many how good Firefox is over IE.
Unfortunately, I can't get totally away from it. Some sites are best used with IE and I have to use IE at work.
Oh well...
no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 09:42 am (UTC)Hola muchacho...
have safe flight home
no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 09:58 am (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 10:09 am (UTC)You'll still need IE for a fair number of sites, not because they're optimized for IE, but because IE has more robust rendering and can handle minor page flaws better than Firefox. The true measure of browser quality is does the browser degrade gracefully when rendering poorly formed HTML, and that's where Firefox comes up short.
But many prefer the UI features of Firefox, so see if it's to your taste!
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 10:44 am (UTC)I'm leaning towards hardware as it sometimes will do so as Windows loads stuff from the startup menue.
I can't do too many things at once as it increases computer use and that's where it really gets flakey.
Time to have an expert check it out.
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 10:48 am (UTC)The only that that's really going to fix that is a new PC.
You can get a very decent, brand spanking new HP computer for about $340 shipped directly to your home. That's probably cheaper than hiring someone to try to figure out how to fix your old PC, and it's probably a hell of a lot faster than whatever you have now.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 10:50 am (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 10:54 am (UTC)I'm thinking perhaps try replacing the MB in this current box and within a few months (by January or so) upgrade the processor.
A friend can "slip" me a working copy of XP and knows how to get it installed despite it's install limitations. :-D.
I can get a pretty good MB for less than $100 if I shop around - even if it means going integrated for AGP and audio.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 11:00 am (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 11:19 am (UTC)I'll spare you the lecture about how stealing is wrong, but you should probably be aware that it's really, really tacky to tell Microsoft employees about how you're going to steal their software. Not cool.
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 11:38 am (UTC)I did have to borrow a copy of Win98 to get it going since all I had at the time was Win95 and it would not recognize the bios on the Asus board.
The idea was to upgrade to either Win2k, or XP but did not have the cash for the longest time to purchase. I don't normaly advacate stealing, but I've always been a bit angry at this install limitation thingy that MS has implimented - to the point of forcing users to repurchase rights to the software if a major upgrade is made. That to me is just not smart or good.
All it serves is to piss off the customer, the end users who rely on MS products and please, MS should drop the price of their old OS when a new one comes out. That makes no sense at all.
Excuse me for ranting, but I know I'm not the only one who feels this way.
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 12:08 pm (UTC)Are you talking about product activation? Maybe you're misunderstanding something?
Jeez, John, it sounds like you don't even have a valid Windows 98 license, so why are you pissed off? You've been getting a free ride for years by the sound of it...
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 12:23 pm (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 02:31 pm (UTC)that and I can see the animated icons again! w00t!
(i'm so easy to please.)
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 03:18 pm (UTC)Take it outside. :)
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 04:11 pm (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-17 08:27 pm (UTC)I did try to find a second hand copy of 98 through Second Hand Books and they had been hard to find and while I've not looked in the past year. I've been busy and have been doing other things. When I had my old P133 box, it came with Win95, which as you know, won't work on later pc's, so had to borrow, originaly for short term stop gap measures, but financial hardships at the time prevented me from purchasing anything like that for the longest time. Now, I've got a decent job but had to purchase a new printer, a new monitor and am now having to deal with the main box and do intend to things more ligitimaly.
As for the free ride, since 2001 and like I said, was only meant to be stop gap, but life interviened and had to hold off much longer than orignaly planned.
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-18 02:27 pm (UTC)The Windows XP hardware changes limitation is annoying, but it stops unscrupulous system builders from selling the same copy of XP to thousands of people. Most folks never replace their motherboards. Even if you do, you can just call MSFT to get activated, some largish number of times. It got a lot of bad press, but it gets in very few peoples' way.
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-20 07:06 am (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-20 09:38 am (UTC)Tell you what: E-mail me your shipping address [that would be cpratt at microsoft dot com] and I'll get a copy of XP Home [full version] shipped out to you on my own dime. Deal?
PC Help Desk
Date: 2004-09-20 12:23 pm (UTC)Firefox
Date: 2004-09-20 12:26 pm (UTC)As for the CSS/Java/YaddaYadda that Marmot mentioned, I'm blissfully ignorant of all of that crap. So far, I haven't run across any sites that it couldn't handle -- then again, all I usually surf is LJ and IMDB and Amazon and Bear411. :)
Re: Firefox
Date: 2004-09-20 12:27 pm (UTC)Re: Hola muchacho...
Date: 2004-09-20 12:27 pm (UTC)Re: PC Help Desk
Date: 2004-09-20 12:36 pm (UTC)Thank you for reading Dave Cobb's journal, where the elite meet to diagnose and solve PC problems... :)
Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-20 05:16 pm (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-20 05:31 pm (UTC)If you run into me out and about, I demand a Guinness. :)
Re: Firefox
Date: 2004-09-20 05:34 pm (UTC)Re: JFirefox
Date: 2004-09-21 05:59 pm (UTC)